Still, overall, both interfaces are easy to use. You still can’t get rid of the baby blue and white design in the web interface or Tether app.
Even if you can access the web interface using a mobile browser, having one all-encompassing interface would be best-and one with a dark mode too. This dual-interface design doesn’t make sense, given router manufacturers push their apps as your primary go-to control panel. Some are only accessible through the web interface, like the VPN, and some are only made available in the Tether app, like security, parental controls, and quality of service settings. You don’t have one interface to change all the settings.
#TP LINK ROUTER PRO#
The bad news is the same complaints we had with the AX5400 Pro live on with the AXE75. Hopefully, this choice is a sign that the company is now leaning towards a more unified experience for users who stay with TP-Link routers. That’s a good thing, as TP-Link tends to have multiple interfaces across its standalone router family. The AXE75 uses the same interface provided on the AX5400 Pro model we previously tested and reviewed. Gigabit Ethernet is your speed bottleneck.
#TP LINK ROUTER DOWNLOAD#
We presume the reason for having 160 MHz channels on the AXE75 is to enable two compatible devices to download up to 1,200Mbps each simultaneously, but again, that won’t happen since there’s no 2.5Gbps Ethernet at play. But you’ll never reach those wireless speeds because your wired speeds max out at 940Mbps. Second, the router supports 160 MHz channels, so technically, it offers up to 2,400Mbps on the 5 GHz and 6 GHz bands each. First, this router has no 2.5Gbps Ethernet port, so your wired internet speed is locked to real-world speeds of around 940Mbps. The real head-scratcher comprises two things. That new frontier should mean less interference and better speeds than the 5 GHz connection. Why else would you buy this router if you didn’t have one, right? You get all these new channels that are, at least at this point, probably untapped by your neighbors. We didn’t want to give the AXE75 this score, but the design doesn’t make sense in our book.įirst, we have the 6 GHz band, which is awesome if you have a compatible device. All three have an average of around 858Mbps at close range and around 247Mbps when we test at 120 feet across the street. That’s quite a difference.Īs for the 5 GHz testing, the AXE75 matched similar 5,400Mbps routers with similar prices, such as the TP-Link Archer AX5400 Pro and the NETGEAR Nighthawk RAX50. Both tested at a 1,550Mbps average in the same spot when we used a 160 MHz channel-624Mbps more throughput than the AXE75. In contrast, the MSI RadiX GRAXE66 and NETGEAR Nighthawk RAXE500 have 2.5Gbps Ethernet ports. Using the wider channel doesn’t produce a brain-melting boost in speed, but it does get you closer to Gigabit Ethernet’s limit. When we tested with a narrower 80 MHz channel, we recorded an 854Mbps average. You now have a better chance of getting real-world sub-2Gbps (Gig+) wireless speeds using 160 MHz channels, but you need a 2.5Gbps Ethernet port to utilize them fully.įor example, the AXE75 achieved a 926Mbps average at close range because Gigabit Ethernet bottlenecks it. Of course, the new connection’s big selling point is the superfast speed the 5 GHz band struggles to achieve. It’s a low-power broadcast, too, so your cat videos shouldn’t interfere with incumbent services or your neighbor’s network like the 5 GHz band does. The whole point of the new 6 GHz band is to have more wireless terrain to fill.
0 kommentar(er)
